Friday, March 6, 2026

"2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."

                      Key terms or words: People like this suck. 

                                                  "The wrath of American justice."

Paolo Jack Reed.
Kim Williams Nature Preserve.
Missoula, MT. 2020.

ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME, PLEASE, ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT ME PERSONALLY: 

paoloreed@gmail.com

_________________________________

              Punitive Retaliation Remains the Hallmark Defensive Mechanism of Even Today's Bad Acting American Psychiatrists. 

By P. Jack "PJ" Reed.  March 06, 2026. Portland, OR. 

      There are two sorts of men in the world- those who outdone the accomplishments of their fathers and the those who remain forever in the patriaachil shadows. (From "Boss of bosses. The fall of the Godfather." Joseph O'Brien and Adris Kurins. 1991 Simon and Shuster.)

    I highly doubt that these kind of people, these pseudo-doctors, can understand the above. And I know that the one ninny, Ira Gaddy, has a father who is real medical doctor. Clearly, he has failed in this regard. 

Further discussion of psychiatric exclusivity. 

    Which can also be interpreted as psychiatric exceptionalism, as though only people like them have access to the civil rights that all persons have coming to them in full. "Except for us," people like this will say when it comes to claiming special privilege and entitlement. 

   They cannot wrap their heads around the fact that no American is entitled to in any way, shape or fashion abuse the civil and human rights of any other American citizen or citizens. Illness does not open any such doors, no form of illness. They fall back on denying that mental illness is an illness first and foremost, as means to wrongly justify how they too often behave. 

    As for use of punitive retaliation in any of its myriad forms to wrongly punish the very people they claim to care so much about, well, sorry, but that proves something entirely different. No caring medical provider would ever act in these ways. Which should be obvious. Or one might think. They strike me as vividly bizarre in terms of just how far removed they are from any and all such well established standards of American law and crucial measures of public policy, which like or not, flow directly from the values that all good kids learn when young, and the very principles upon which the nation was built. 

    My own heritage, oh man, goes beyond just my Chickasaw family line, and the first generation children of Irish and German immigrants that are my maternal grandparents name. T. Boone Pickens, a Texas multi-millionaire (I recall that when I was really young, my dad would joke about "West Texas Pickens", and Boone was one), compiled a family history that extends back to the American Revolution. The very name Boone, as well as Jackson (my father's name was Jackson Reed Pickens), carry weight in this context, not limited to Andrew Jackson, (a very distend ancestor of this writer's); while another family name the speaks to my own identity today, in our family history, Calhoun, is reference to John Caldwell Calhoun, and American statesmen and political theorist who served the 7th vice president of USA, circa the years 1825-1832. 

     I digress, however. All I really thinking in sharing this has to be with my stating in a very recent piece, that these lying American psychiatrists have picked the wrong man to mess with. So there it is, and fuck any of these white men who have for well over 75 years have been misdiagnosing serious mental illness. 

    Punitive retaliation, ergo, the hallmark defensive mechanism of today's many bad acting American psychiatrists, a point I have made clear of well over 10 years now. 

    If any one wrong most stands out it is this. They really do act as though they are the mafia, 'hitting' cum taking out 'hits' on those who are willing to challenge them, punishing such Americans as though they are deserving such abuse.

    And all too much like a mafia Don, be it Paul Castellans or any member of the illustrious Gambino family. they dress up in hope in hope of  creating illusions of civility. Creating false appearances is the trademark of organized crime, as per many sources of sound information to the effect. And not other kind of medical professional so desperately rly upon false appearances than do the typical American psychiatrist.  

   But there is nothing civil about leveling punitive retaliation towards any American citizen who actively expresses his or her own 1st Amendment right(s) to free speech, no matter the setting nor the respective circumstances. Such action is illegal, inhumane, and utterly in defiance of legitimately compassionate medical professionals of any sort.  

    Only these kind of doctors so aggressively act in this manner, and for what it is worth, punitive retaliation is definitively violent on its, actions of the sort in any of its variations. Not that they will never admit to such shit. But the fact remains, this has happened to me personally in both state managed mental hospitals I have to date spent time in, open and very egregious use of punishment as means to cow their own patients into submission, or lesser overt methods, such as denying access to care on the same basis.

   The doctors and administrators at The Arizona State Hospital, the Montana State Hospital, and Providence-St. Patrick's Hospital in Missoula, MT, all took this specific type of action against this writer, 2011 (AZ), 2016 (MT, [Colby Wang]), and Missoula, 2019 (Jason Molinaro, Robert Munjal, Ira Gaddy).

      They seem to think a person cannot understand when they are being abused in this manner. This is patent ignorance flowing from age old prejudice towards mentally ill persons. They assume that we are not capable of calling about bad human behavior, and seem to forget, in fact, that they are human beings in fact, susceptible to the same weaknesses and ill-advised temptations that any person bears equally.

     It is like this, just like this. These people have been acting in the same way for just as long as they been in existence, here in the US and beyond. Acting superior to the people who come to them in trust, be that via government provided 'power' or the oft ill-advised American medical doctor. 

     But very exclusively, and here again, this is all about irrefutable behavioral patterns, the American psychiatrist is king of this particularly nefarious ant hill. They behave far worse than any other type medical provider this writer has thus far sought to trust. And only have psychiatrists most acted in ways to weaken my own trust of them.  

   ""Hegseth's comments are a reminder that govern-ment isn't always eager to show the human cost of war."

     Herein a very frightening similarity to the fact that the American psychiatrist has never been eager to discuss the costs imposed on mentally ill Americans forced by circumstance to survive the violence of the American streets. 

     They did not give a rat's ass in the early to mid 1970s, when 10s upon 10s of thousands of their own severely mentally ill patients were forced onto the American streets (RE: the failed promise of  'deinstitutionalization'). And they do not care today about the fact that limited access to longer term in-patient psychiatric care and treatment is again forcing 10s of thousands of their own patients onto the violent streets of our otherwise great nation, conditions that may be more violent that any point in the recent past.

     What might any of they say in response to this specific allegation? Regardless of the common sense elements underlying such claims? Neither the American Psychiatric Association nor the vast majority of its collective membership have ever been willing to offer sincere response to such suggestions. It's not what they do. 

Period.  Fuck.    

    It's as bad today as ever when it comes to the suffering of seriously mentally ill American citizens, arguably worse due to the current federal administration. And I attest that some number of today's any bad acting American psychiatrists are on the same page as men like white men like Trump and Hegseth.

Now for some meat to chaw upon.

   "In Search of an Evidence-based Role for Psychiatry"

    By John Reed, Olga Rudman, and Jacqui Dillon. March 28, 2016.

         "A dilemma for all of us who are struggling to broaden our undemanding of distress beyond simplistic, pessimistic, biogenetic ideology, and to improve our nation's public mental health services accordingly, is whether or to to soften our criticisms of psychiatry in the hope of reaching those those psychiatrists whose minds are not totally closed. 
     But doing so rests on the assumption that change can come from within the profession. For the last few decades examples of that are few and far between. Therefor, in this article, published in the open access journal "Future Science", we pull no punches. We do try, however, to demonstrate that our criticisms are evidence-based, in the traditional, research-oriented, meaning of that phrase. Two of us (Olga and Jacqui) also have another form of evidence, based on personal experience, of the urgent need for those who fund and manage mental health services to stop assuming that 'the doctor knows best' ".

     Note that its been just over ten years since this critical bit of truth was shared among validly qualified scientific experts. And if ever these is one thing that the American psychiatrist most rejects, that would be the personal expertness of people who come to them in hope of being treated like fully serving human beings.

      No, no way the needed change will come from "within the profession." Fact being, as per the record since the very early 20th century, is that the only time the profession has ever 'changed' has been due to demands of the American people, right up through the 1970s, when: A) the people said shut those fucking horror show hospitals down; and B) when the people demanded that homosexual and gay Americans be seen as human beings. 

         And while those things were needed, for goddamn sure, the hospitals were shUt down but there was nowhere for 10s upon 10s of thousands of severely mentally ill American to but onto the streets, as was discussed above, and as per my own vested experience in these accursed state managed mental hospitals, and beyond, and despite the APA now being headed by a gay freak-show psychiatrist who was not even born in the US, these doctors discriminate against mentally ill gay men and women on par with how they still discriminate against mentally ill persons, in general.

    On this closing note, then. These people are vermin with fancy titles and nice clothing, nothing more or less that that. I am sick of all that they still get away with. But oh so thankfully, as per the heightened attention on the fallacy of the psychiatric bible, the accursed DSM, today I see some hope, a fresh bit of hope. And as more real scientist continue to bust gaping holes in the this patently fake ass medical text, I am willing to hazard a guess that perhaps the American psychiatrist is coming to sense his own pending demise. 

    The APA's recent by-line in reaction to such attention, that they will now be solely publishing the statistical bullshit of the DSM on the internet don't mean shit. As I see it, they just want to make more difficult for the American people to really give a good look over.

     Aha, as per the usual, new appearances that are just as false as they have always been. The kind of people who only know to pose as this or that, who only know to assume that a college degree means they matter. Nope, I got my GED at the age of 29, and surprised nobody more than myself at getting very high grades throughout, right up to that point when my own untreated SMI came to interfere in my law school trajectory. Too bad, you fucks. I know the law well, I know the full breadth of civil rights law well as per the the authority of the CRA of 1964, and very much understand all Acts of the US Congress, not limited to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and 2008 revised ed., as well: Which tells us that discrimination towards mentally ill Americans extends to all public services, not limited to public mental health care services.          

   This conversation about the exclusivity of the psychiatric profession and psychiatric exceptionalism will continue. 

  Tomorrow then. The distinct gullibility of these people, and their weak ass susceptibility to easy to avoid- if you gots what it takes- sociopolitical influences of most any and all kinds. 

   “It just shows that in our country right now, health care has been politicized in a way that political messages are driving and impacting care — and not always for good,” said Dr. Susan Sirota, a pediatrician in Highland Park, Illinois, who wasn’t involved with the research.

    Yep, like taking candy from babies. _______________________

    Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted  flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.

    And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.

     _____________________________

Paolo Jack Reed.
Founder.
Stoner Woods/Red River.
Caddo Parish, LA. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

I would really love input of any kind from anybody with any interest whatsoever in the issues that I am sharing in this blog. I mean it, anybody, for I will be the first one to admit that I may be inaccurately depicting certain aspects of the conditions
at ASH, and anonymous comments are fine. In any case, I am more than willing to value anybody's feelings about my writing, and I assure you that I will not intentionally exploit or otherwise abuse your right to express yourself as you deem fit. This topic is far, far too important for anything less. Thank you, whoever you are. Peace and Frogs.