"2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."

                      Key terms or words: People like this suck.  

                                                  "The wrath of American justice."

Paolo Jack Reed.
Kim Williams Nature Preserve.
Missoula, MT. 2020.

________________

Psychobabble of the Month: Think of Jealousy as a Mental Disorder

By MIA Editors

 - February 26, 2026.

    In an article published in top psychiatiric journal JAMA Psychiatry.  researchers David Mataix-Cols and Johan Åhlén argue that doctors should be on the lookout for a new diagnosis: obsessional jealousy. In response, we consulted our book of Shakespeare, and started counting the number of lead characters who suffered from this “defect.”

     Othello seems to be the leading example of this, and little did we know there was already a diagnostic term for it in the research literature: the “Othello syndrome.”

   Prolonged grief was suggested as a possible disorder in DSM-5 before making its big official debut in ICD-11 and DSM-5 TR. Jealousy is following the same playbook: DSM-5 already floated obsessional jealousy as a possible “other” OCD-related disorder, so Mataix-Cols and Åhlén’s article is the next step in moving it into the official diagnosis territory.

     “The analogy with prolonged grief disorder is instructive,” Mataix-Cols and Åhlén write, about their new jealousy diagnosis. “Grief is universal, but in a minority of people it becomes persistent, debilitating, and qualitatively distinct, warranting recognition as a disorder to facilitate appropriate treatment.” Jealousy is the same, they suggest: “in some people, jealousy becomes excessive, intrusive, persistent, and uncontrollable, undermining rather than protecting intimacy

    And here we have it. These 'doctors' create highly questionable diagnoses of serious mental illness, and while we might point right at the false medical text these fuckers have relied upon since no later then the early 1950s, herein it's more or less about willful exploitation of uninformed American people, throwing psychiatric medications around in a manner that is clearly not therapeutic. Irresponsible to such degree that I highly doubt the competence of these supposedly trustworthy medical professionals.

     If anything, these doctors are jealous of valid medical doctors, as well. They likely resent other doctors, in fact, those who make one hell of lot more money that the majority of these doctors make. 

 

       Not that I have not questioned this well before now. Rather, that it is equally shocking to when I entered the Arizona State Hospital on January 10, 2010, wherein on my first fucking day I witnessed psychiatric sickening abuse of a man.  

   And yet, this is what they call it:  medication therapy.  This shit is point perfect with Dr. Ira Gaddy talking about taking his own patients on and off very real medications at his obvious whim. Motherfuckers, it ’s 100% on point with the charlatans who once sold snake oil in back alleys circa the darkness of the 19th century. And it’s either willful, as in criminal in fact, given the dangers associated with anti-depressants and other like substances, wherein you see on the TV, clear and overt warnings about the risk of very real suicidal ideation. 

    Not enough to add the idea:  Call your doctor if…

    And as per the usual, the American people are left with no idea of how many people perished as a direct result of such irresponsible 'medical advice.'

    

     This is also a pattern, too, so little due accountability specific to these kind of doctors. They have gotten way to comfortable in dealing with people who cannot speak for themselves. They seem to forget, or they just still cannot believe it, that there are many mentally ill are quite smart, people who may well be smarter than them. I see Dr. Mark Vonnegut as one such person, and also see him as far more ethical than they are, having chosen to be a very competent medical doctor who specializes as a pediatrician.   

    And, of course, this writer was calling out the invalidity of statistical deduction, inference, and analysis many fucking years ago, as published herein. Now, so much added evidence in support of the concerns I have been expressing in good faith since early April, 2012. Wherein the first activist blog I ever published, "PJ. Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse, as means to defend the never yet enforced civil and human rights of persons who like myself are affected and disabled by serious mental illness.

    Well worth taking a look at the 2022 documentary film, "Medicating Normal. The untold story of what can happen when profit-driven medicine intersects with human beings in distress." 

    Note: INTERSECTS WITH HUMAN BEINGS IN DISTRESS. 

    These kind of people still do not mentally ill American as fully deserving human beings. And yes, they are yoked to the pharmaceutic industry, as well. They are producing for too many new drugs, but all they care about in making big money in this sense. Anytime a medical field is whipped by the pharmaceutical industry, of course quality in care goes backwards. 

    But these doctors are simply too ignorant to understand this, all they care about is themselves, and that has been proven for just as long as the DSM has been published, and longer if one considers what is like to have references. 

     I mean, like many things, even the worst doctors out there, any kind of doctor, can possibly do at least some good, and this carries to the DSM, as well, having at least some of value.  But remains a false medial text. They have been using this shit for so long, well it's no different from what they have gotten away with so much for so fucking long. And as far as I concerns, they still seek to normalize abuse. 

      To them, many of them, mentally ill persons deserve to be abused, as was proved down to the letter but Dr. Laxman Patel right the hell after I arrived to ASH said this:

             "This the state hsopital. What do you except" 

   

   Now, I have talked about this shit far too many times. But I will again say again, that in my mind, he was saying very clearly that, because he is a psychiatrist, we should expect these kind of people to abuse us. They are by far the most dangerous doctors out there today, have long been the most dangerous, and all signs tell me, that they getting more dangerous with each passing day.   

     We are all- US citizens- deserving far better than what American Psychiatric Association has provided to mentally ill American citizens. From families of mentally persons, to dear friends of us, and so on, And these pseudo-doctors who still rely on the DSM, a patently false medical text that has also left the American people with an unknowable number of otherwise preventable harms not limited to preventable death for just as long long as this rag of publication has been produced.

    Fuck these kind of people, they care not for the general public nor the very people they have long claimed to care so much about. It's a travesty that speaks to as grave an injustice as might be imagined today. The APA remains to the most irresponsible governing authority in the history of modern medicine. And any who still rely on that shit are perpetuating the same lie they have been laying on the American people since well before the accursed DSM was even published.

  NOTE: Founder and editor PJ Reed has been invited to speak at Portland State University, during an upcoming "Literature Arts" festival, to be held March 21-24, 2026. The festival itself is a cooperative affair sponsored by PSU's English and American Studies programs. Yes, PJ has a degree in American Studies, and is well read in all areas of modern literature, as well. (Denise Hardy. San Fransico, CA. 3.07.26)                    

      Zobaidul Amin, 28, pleaded not guilty during an initial court appearance in Anchorage on Thursday after the FBI took custody of him in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where he had been studying medicine and facing related charges, U.S. prosecutors wrote in a detention memorandum. (Associated Press Briefing. March 06, 2026.)

    And do not try to tell us that people studying to be become medical doctors in places like India, the Philippines, or in Malaysia, do not pose risk to American citizens after by SMI, should such people seek to relocate to our own otherwise great nation. Nor that psychiatry itself, and these such people who might choose to become foreign-American psychiatrists, are not attracted to open windows so as take unfair advantage of lesser empowered human beings. 

   Yes, the downtown Eugene. OR, has camera tech pointed straight at the toliets used by both the male and female patients there. Of course that attracts very fucked up people, perverts just like Roger Allen Forney. Same commoner, do not tell me that you can guarantee that no perverts would take a job there.  

    Quality in care in steep decline, and we can thank the chaos that is going on our nation. It is benefitting all abusers of authority, or power, or whatever they want to call it. 

    Lecture note (working)

    Much value to reading books. But the most important thing about gaining footing as dedicated reader of well written fiction, or non- fiction for purposes herein, is a good book can teach the active reader about her or himself. I came to know this, well, I'd have to say since I was perhaps 10 or so years old. I recall, for example, that my oldest brother gave me the book, "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" on my 10th birthday, and that single little tale did in later time come to serve well in this sense, opening my mind to possibility, freeing me of the typical binds associated with not being reasonably well read, even when one is a child. 

   Same thing, in retrospect, as the value in interacting with other people. Particularly when the interactions ar somewhat formalized, or something along the lines a interesting conversation, better better yet, serios person to person discourse. What I mean here is that this can also teach one to learn about oneself, more about the unspoken attributes of one's own character. 

    I'll never forget when an ambassador from  Kenya came to visit my family, via my mom's relationship with the UN, when I was just about 8 years. That man, it was really quite fantastic to experience, knelt down on the ground in our front yard, and spoke to me as though I was an adult. The impression upon, even though very brief, had lasting effect, and as stated, I will never forget the innate quality of that one single interaction with another human being.

    And so on. People can grow, can better themselves if and when they embrace these nature of nuances as a form of personal learning. I see here a very compelling factor when it comes to the role of the psychoanalyst cum psychiatrist. These are people, these are human being who like anyone else can have have the capacity to learn about themselves as that try to learn more about the patient. They very actively peer into the personality of the people they are seeking to treat, and this does relate to active 1:1 discourse, versus the lesser qualitative idea of medication 'therapy'. 

    The role of the psychoanalyst was something quite different some 30-40 years ago, than what I see going on today. Freudian concepts, e.g., and the once emphasized importance of talk therapy. I cannot speak to how the American psychiatrist went about 1.1 discourse with their own patient in the 1970s or 1980s, nor ever the 90s and into the early 200os, solely because I had never yet spoken to so much as behavioral or mental health type of therapist until 2010, in fact. 

    I might seek to hazard some nature of guess about this idea, to ponder what I do know about those earlier periods in American sociocultural history. But that just doesn't put me in position of knowing, in fact, how things were going in those days, with direct respect for the psychiatric inquiry into the personal thinking of other human beings.    

    But there is no denying that one can learn about him or herself via both reading a well written novel, or taking the time to sit in conversation with another person. This is all I have really ever sought anytime I take my own time to do such things as this. I read to learn about myself, and a I very much strive to learn more about myself anytime I am in one on one conversation with someone else, particularly more formalized conversation cum intense like discourse; as well as when I am tryin to learn about someone else. 

     It's really about the learned human condition, I might argue, in a modernized sense. This, in the sense to people today can either embrace the qualitative elements at stake anytime one engages in 'deep' person to person interactions of just about any kind, or they best be ready to lose out. I recall listening to a police officer, this would have been in 2013, when APDForward was first coming steam, who shared in this very simple idea. That he could do his own job just that much better were he able to try and learn about his own most personal awareness about himself, his actual motivation in becoming a cop, and so on, merely by sound listening to those he interacts with in his work. 

     To learn about the person sitting in front of you, in a flowing sort of manner wherein you are are actively seeking to to gain better understanding of yourself, your own self awareness of who you are, who you hope to be, and what really is most important to you.

    Books and all form of literature have served all modern human beings very well over the last few, what, the last few centuries? It's always a pleasure to talk with others about my own love for the written word, as pertains, too, to the spoken word. It's a trade this fro that affair, there should be no denying this. 

    Thank you.   

    Yes, when I attended a protest after the police murder of Robert Boyd, I met a professor working in the same program specific to my BA in American Studies. And when we later met in his office, I shared with that I am am affected by serious mental illness. And he stated very clearly, "If ever the was something relevant to American Studies, it's about the fact that the national public mental health care system is no better organized today that at any point in the past." 

Got that straight, just as dysfunctional today as in the past. This can and shall be blamed of them, them and the APA. They have never proven they care about us, have been abusing the shit out mentally people for the close to the last century. 

Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted  flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.

    And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.

     _____________________________

Paolo Jack Reed.
Founder.
Stoner Woods/Red River.
Caddo Parish, LA. 

  

     

     

dddd 

  "2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."

                      Key terms or words: People like this suck.  

                                                  "The wrath of American justice."

Paolo Jack Reed.
Kim Williams Nature Preserve.
Missoula, MT. 2020.

ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME, PLEASE, ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT ME PERSONALLY: 

paoloreed@gmail.com

       There are simply too many things being exposed that remain point specific to American psychiatry, exclusive to these kind of doctors only, that there is no way in hell they will be geeitn away with their own shit for very longer. Documentary film, mainstream news reporting, my own having proved about abusive psychiatrists in state managed mental hospitals, and just shit load of equally revelations about them and them only. 

   More on exclusivity specific to a very exclusive  type of medical doctor. Only they had a dominant presence in the horror show mental hospitals of the era to mid 20th century, just as only they have the most control over all in-patient psychiatric care settings today. 

     Hard to deny one thing, yet they only know to deny truth no matter how loudly is manifests in the United States today specific to the contemporary American psychiatrist. This in and of itself is rather exclusive behavior, never wanting the admit truth no matter how obvious it is. 

        They only created the DSM- 1952- as means to appear more of less expertise, and yet, the thing remains a patently false medical text that has long left the American people as a whole with no way of knowing how many otherwise preventable harms and deaths have been caused by the DSM's utterly invalid method(s) of diagnosing serious illness.

   Prior to 1952, it was more or less guesswork at best, having no form of direct referential source, even though the DSM has always been a patently false medical text since 1952.

   These motherfuckers can take all such 'subtypes' and put them where no sun ever shines. They are liars and dimwits, either willful in creating false approaches of this kind, or too goddamn stupid to understand invalid scientific methods, period. Ugh... Fuck.  

Dr. Ira Gaddy.
The ninny in full view.
Arrogant, insecure'
white male American.
The son of  a white Mississippi doctor.
White wealth in the Deep South, 
and all that that implies. 

    They are criminally minded Americans with medical degrees who have run amok in the US for no less that the last 150 odd years, and the time frame used herein that includes the establishment of "The Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane", the very ugly predecessor of the American Psychiatric Association itself, which was founded in 1844, as well as the first edition of the false medical text, 1952, the proverbial bible of American psychiatry. 

    And so much more the horror show American psychiatric hospitals circa the early to upper middle 19th; the failed promise of  mother fucking  deinstitutionalization in the 1960s-1970s, the characterization of homosexual men and women as depraved criminals well into the 1970s.

    Progress continues in myriad form, while these kind of 'doctors' remain lodged like stickers in the heel of young children, never caring to move forward now in any way alter the shitty ass way the have always done things.  

1,500 Buffalo Returned To Tribes In 2025

The InterTribal Buffalo Council, which represents 89 member nations, has spent decades rebuilding buffalo herds after federal extermination campaigns and land dispossession nearly wiped the animals from tribal homelands. The group’s 2025 transfers included animals from public, private and tribal lands to nations such as the Blackfeet Nation, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Modoc Nation, Osage Nation, White Earth Nation and others across the Plains, Midwest and West.

     And as proven above, many American Indians are effectively recreating progress via reintroducing crucial traditions. It's a joke, the fact that the American psychiatrist is willing to call themselves "modern American medical doctors." The only ones in the US who cannot seem to grasp progress, as I see it, are people like this, the American psychiatrist. 

    This said, three words of note. 

 l. Exceptionalism. Which refers to the kind of Americans who feel they are inherently exceptional. 

    Only lesser intelligent persons would believe that a medical degree proves that the person is inherently caring, or in any way exceptional.  On this note, it is not very exceptional to be the only kind of doctor with a history of horror show mental hospitals.

2. Exclusivity. Which describes behaviors as well things such as due accountability. 

   They get away with shit that no other kind of professional, including medical doctors, would ever be able to get away with the shit they still get away with today.  

3. Exclusionary-ism. Speaks to excluding those willing to challenge them.

     Missoula, MT, Providence-St. Patrick's Hospital's acute "NBMI" in-patient psychiatric unit, Dr. Robert Munjal sought to play the role of a unilateral, patently unobjective investigator. I was falsely accused of behavior not ever connected to me, and his telling me when I pressed for due redress, "I can see no patterns."

   And on basis of my not agreeing with this, these same Providence-St. Patrick's psychiatrists fell into excluding my access to that unit from that time thereafter.  

     On further note, only these kind of doctors so easily avoid due accountability, a very exclusive sort of status. And proven by the fact that the white American psychiatrists  involved in the preventable death of April Mott violated Tarasoff Act.   

  As follows. 

The Tarasoff law (derived from Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 1976) establishes a mental health professional's "duty to protect" intended victims from foreseeable, serious, and imminent threats of violence by a patient. This legal obligation, often called a "duty to warn," overrides patient confidentiality, requiring therapists to take reasonable steps—such as notifying police or the victim.

Key Aspects of the Tarasoff Rule

• The Case: In 1969, Prosenjit Poddar told his psychologist at UC Berkeley he intended to kill Tatiana Tarasoff. Despite the warning to police, the victim was not warned and was subsequently murdered. The California Supreme Court ruled that therapist-patient confidentiality ends where public peril begins.
• Duty to Protect vs. Warn: While the initial 1974 ruling emphasized the "duty to warn" the victim, the 1976 final ruling (Tarasoff II) focused on the broader "duty to protect," which can be fulfilled by warning the target, notifying law enforcement, hospitalizing the patient, or taking other reasonable steps.
• Requirements for Duty: The duty is generally triggered when a patient makes a specific, credible, and imminent threat against a clearly identifiable victim.
• Application Across States: While established in California, many states have adopted similar "duty to warn" or "duty to protect" laws, though specific requirements regarding whether to warn the victim or notify police vary by jurisdiction.
• Exceptions & Limits: The rule typically does not apply to vague, non-specific threats or when there is no identifiable victim.

       Jablonski by Pahls v. United States, 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1983)^[1] is a landmark case in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a mental health professional's duty to predict dangerousness includes consulting a patient's prior records, and that their duty to protect includes the involuntary commitment of a dangerous individual; simply warning the foreseeable victim is insufficient.

        In 1987, the American Psychiatric Association established guidelines for clinicians regarding the duty to protect. The guidelines state that a patient must express a clear threat of killing or significantly injuring a specific (or at least a reasonably identified victim), voice threats of destruction of property that may place others in danger, express intent, and also possess the ability to execute the threat. Clinicians must take reasonable precautions for protecting third parties, such as notifying the identifiable victim(s), informing the police, or hospitalizing the patient voluntarily or involuntarily. There have been no established legal guidelines for assessing the risk to third parties.

      The American Psychiatric Association is not the final authority when it comes to this area of concern. Much to the contrary, duty to warn and requirements specific to mental health workers in this specific areas of concerns remain matters of US law. 

   Patterns. Even the APA seeks to act as arbitrator, when no member of the APA's board nor any American psychiatrist is lawyer. 

   It happens all the time, such as when my ASH psychiatrist willfully tried to persuade me to not contact Phoenix police after an ASH staff member, a technician, had physically assaulted me. Note too, that they doctored- no intended pun- the actual video data specific to this matter. 

     And again, Missoula, MT, in Providence-St. Patrick's Hospital's acute "NBMI" in-patient psychiatric unit, Dr. Robert Munjal sought to play the role of a uni-lateral, unobejective investigator. I was falsely accused of behavior not ever connected to me, and his telling me when I pressed for due redress, "I can see no patterns."

   And on basis of my not agreeing with this, these same Providence-St. Patrick's psychiatrists fell into excluding my access to that unit from that time thereafter.  

    Time is fast coming, this is a given at this stage, when American psychiatry will be exposed once and for all. And I am satisfied in knowing that I am playing a role in it. I am not a violent nor abusive person, but they sure the fuck are. 

____________________

Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted  flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.

    And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.

     _____________________________

Paolo Jack Reed.
Founder.
Stoner Woods/Red River.
Caddo Parish, LA. 

 

      

     

"2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."

                      Key terms or words: People like this suck. 

                                                  "The wrath of American justice."

Paolo Jack Reed.
Kim Williams Nature Preserve.
Missoula, MT. 2020.

ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME, PLEASE, ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT ME PERSONALLY: 

paoloreed@gmail.com

______________________________________

    Psychobabble of the Week: Jealousy as  a new mental disorder?

      Indeed, and right the fuck along with "seasonal affective disorder", just one more addition to a false medical text. They come up with whatever might better serve them to throw around pills like drug addicts on speed. They are addicted to statistical inference, analysis and deduction, little different form gambling addicts. Or, to put it more to the point, gambling with the lives of mentally ill Americans for just as long and the American Psychiatric Assocation's accursed Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 

_______________________________

  For the record: It was certainly no coincidence that a wannabe white male Indian-American psychiatrist named Dr. Laxman Patel, who was born into and upper-caste Indian family, where he was also raised and educated prior to being permitted to practice in our otherwise great nation would ever say the following in response to my speaking out about patient abuse at the Arizona State Hospital:

 "This is the state hospital. What do you expect?"  

      Upper caste Indian's are taught to see themselves as better than the rest of those who live in that nation. Just as it no coincidence that white Americans born into wealth and privilege in the Deep South are mother-fucking racists. Or that first generation children of upper caste Indian families allowed to immigrate into the US over act in ways to appear as though highly intelligent. 

      Fuck Dr. Robert Munjal, and both Dr. Patel's I have thus had the deal with. Neither understand that rules are rules. They are no less dangerous than textbook racists who still dominate much of still goes in the south. I saw it when I lived in Louisiana, and I have seen it in my home state of New Mexico, which is a tripartite societal construct, where white people look down at Hispanics, while the Hispanics look down at American Indians in New Mexico.

   One of my best friends in NM, a Taos pueblo man named Vince Lujan, who  wrote his own thesis in the University of NM on that issue. Our nation has always reflected the same, rich people who look down on the poor, educated people look down at the uneducated, and on the list goes. 

I am well educated, but the circumstances by which I found my way into college kept my looking down at un-educated persons. Having never believed I would ever ever go into college. Having gotten my GED at the age of 29, and surprising nobody but myself in being able to graduate from UNM with a double major (BA, American Studies; BS, Science, Technology, and Society). 

     And going on do well in earning an MA in American Indian Studies, and on from there to law school.

    Of course, by time I hit the James Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona, my long untreated depression came interfere in that specific career aspiration. Which is fine today, I had long known the the legal profession in no less dirty that other such professions; a career decision made when I was under the influence, a full on at home alcoholic. 

     I am sober today, but for a brief relapse very specific to mental health crisis that lasted just under three full weeks. I am one today who can put one beer down with little problem, defying the myths generated by AA. But that took one hell of a long time before I got to that point. 

     The American Psychiatric Association and the majority of its collective membership have been lying to the American no less longer than when the false medical text, the accursed DSM, was published in 1952.

    Now really need ask, what in fuck did they use prior to then as referential guide to how they did shit. They were abusing the holy fuck out mentally ill people in the horror show hospitals of the early to mid-20th century. One kind of doctor only, although it is also true that many American medical doctors of old were more than willing to abuse their own patients in those long past years. 

   But only psychiatry remains entrenched in its own worst traditions today. They have no idea how to change their own bad behaviors, are cowardly in this context alone.

    Lots of data, well published before now, specific to psychiatric exceptionalism and exclusionary tactics- not limited to when the bad acting white or wannabe white male American psychiatrists at Providence-St. Patrick's Hospital, Missoula, MT, willfully excluded me from access after a very serious suicide attempt by hanging in early February, 2020.    

      “Choice of words in clinical work and documentation can betray troubling attitudes, personal values, and fears. Given that psychoanalytic theory remains a core component of psychiatric training, we could do better at recognising (sic) our own defenses. We have developed an entire lexicon of weasel words and magical thinking that we pass between generations and disciplines. It would be hard to come up with an exhaustive list of lies we tell ourselves in psychiatric practice.” (www.madinamerica.com)

      The invocation of exceptionalism can be beneficial, but it can also exact a cost. Employed nationalistically – for example, ‘American exceptionalism’ – it can inspire the citizenry or rally a mob. ‘HIV exceptionalism’ protects vulnerable patients but may compromise public health. Whenever psychiatry asserts special status relative to other medical disciplines, ‘psychiatric exceptionalism’ is implied. Supplemental confidentiality protections, the care of ‘clients’ rather than patients, the psychopharmacologist designation, and other practices emphasise (sic) the other-ness of psychiatry. Cumulatively, these attempts to be or to appear to be ‘exceptional’ have the unintended effect of reinforcing the image of psychiatrists and their patients as exceptions. (www.cambridge.org)

     Shocking data, and while it is likely out there, this related premise, as per what we now call "psychiatric exclusivity", actions against their own patients that are rather exclusive in comparison to other types of medical professionals. 

   And, clearly the time will come when this data comes to take down the inane belief in a false medical text, in addition to all that is included above. 

  

   Just as clear, that as a writer, I would never do justice to the above posits, 'psychiatric exceptionalism, and very similar premise provided by author Richard Sears of Mad in America. Science, Psychiatry, and Social Justice. 

   These fuckers cannot put anything behind me, they are predictably obvious to me today. Their behaviors match the bad acting psychiatrists we all see in the movies. 

_______________________________________   

Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted  flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.

    And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.

     _____________________________

Paolo Jack Reed.
Founder.
Stoner Woods/Red River.
Caddo Parish, LA. 

"2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."

                      Key terms or words: People like this suck. 

                                                  "The wrath of American justice."

Paolo Jack Reed.
Kim Williams Nature Preserve.
Missoula, MT. 2020.

ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME, PLEASE, ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT ME PERSONALLY: 

paoloreed@gmail.com

_________________________________

              Punitive Retaliation Remains the Hallmark Defensive Mechanism of Even Today's Bad Acting American Psychiatrists. 

By P. Jack "PJ" Reed.  March 06, 2026. Portland, OR. 

      There are two sorts of men in the world- those who outdone the accomplishments of their fathers and the those who remain forever in the patriarchal shadows. (From "Boss of bosses. The fall of the Godfather." Joseph O'Brien and Adris Kurins. 1991 Simon and Shuster.)

     So, we gots the one fucker, Ira Gaddy, whose daddy was a real doctor down there in the swamps of Mississippi, while the ill-advised sonny boy chose to become a psychiatrist, very much lodging his own ass in the patriarchal shadows.  

Introduction.

    What is the point of having laws that are not enforced? Is it somehow beyond some Americans who who have no idea of the fact that, if laws are not enforced, same with rules, direct harm is inevitable. 

     And the APA, and its collective membership, have been acting in violation of American law for as long as they have existed. Just because their clients are mentally  ill, that does not excuse for such breaches of US law. I am one does respect the law, and while I have broken a few in my time, none of my own behaviors, even mown bad behaviors, are no comparison to these peop;e 

    Sure, the Department of Justice is all fucked up today, thanks to Trump. But this is only benefiting these law breaking American psychiatrists. They remain very untruthful, and continue to act as though mentally ill people are somehow not fully vested American citizens. All persons born it the US, hello, are equals, not limited to mentally ill Americans.    

    I highly doubt that these kind of people, pseudo-doctors, can understand the above. 

    I care not about rule breakers, nor law breakers. And as per my own experiences, I am well aware that these kind of doctors flout US law, as though they are above the law. it was not ok to treat any American persons so badly in the long ago past, they have been getting away with very serious shit for just as long they have existed. 

Further discussion of psychiatric exclusivity. 

    Which can also be interpreted as psychiatric exceptionalism, as though only people like them have access to the civil rights that all persons have coming to them in full. "Except for us," people like this will say when it comes to claiming special privilege and entitlement. 

   They cannot wrap their heads around the fact that no American is entitled to in any way, shape or fashion abuse the civil and human rights of any other American citizen or citizens. Illness does not open any such doors, no form of illness. They fall back on denying that mental illness is an illness first and foremost, as means to wrongly justify how they too often behave. 

    As for use of punitive retaliation in any of its myriad forms to wrongly punish the very people they claim to care so much about, well, sorry, but that proves something entirely different. No caring medical provider would ever act in these ways. Which should be obvious. Or one might think. They strike me as vividly bizarre in terms of just how far removed they are from any and all such well established standards of American law and crucial measures of public policy, which like or not, flow directly from the values that all good kids learn when young, and the very principles upon which the nation was built. 

    My own heritage, oh man, goes beyond just my Chickasaw family line, and the first generation children of Irish and German immigrants that are my maternal grandparents name. T. Boone Pickens, a Texas multi-millionaire (I recall that when I was really young, my dad would joke about "West Texas Pickens", and Boone was one), compiled a family history that extends back to the American Revolution. The very name Boone, as well as Jackson (my father's name was Jackson Reed Pickens), carry weight in this context, not limited to Andrew Jackson, (a very distend ancestor of this writer's); while another family name the speaks to my own identity today, in our family history, Calhoun, is reference to John Caldwell Calhoun, and American statesmen and political theorist who served the 7th vice president of USA, circa the years 1825-1832. 

     I digress, however. All I really thinking in sharing this has to be with my stating in a very recent piece, that these lying American psychiatrists have picked the wrong man to mess with. So there it is, and fuck any of these white men who have for well over 75 years have been misdiagnosing serious mental illness. 

    Punitive retaliation, ergo, the hallmark defensive mechanism of today's many bad acting American psychiatrists, a point I have made clear of well over 10 years now. 

    If any one wrong most stands out it is this. They really do act as though they are the mafia, 'hitting' cum taking out 'hits' on those who are willing to challenge them, punishing such Americans as though they are deserving such abuse.

    And all too much like a mafia Don, be it Paul Castellans or any member of the illustrious Gambino family. they dress up in hope in hope of  creating illusions of civility. Creating false appearances is the trademark of organized crime, as per many sources of sound information to the effect. And not other kind of medical professional so desperately rly upon false appearances than do the typical American psychiatrist.  

   But there is nothing civil about leveling punitive retaliation towards any American citizen who actively expresses his or her own 1st Amendment right(s) to free speech, no matter the setting nor the respective circumstances. Such action is illegal, inhumane, and utterly in defiance of legitimately compassionate medical professionals of any sort.  

    Only these kind of doctors so aggressively act in this manner, and for what it is worth, punitive retaliation is definitively violent on its, actions of the sort in any of its variations. Not that they will never admit to such shit. But the fact remains, this has happened to me personally in both state managed mental hospitals I have to date spent time in, open and very egregious use of punishment as means to cow their own patients into submission, or lesser overt methods, such as denying access to care on the same basis.

   The doctors and administrators at The Arizona State Hospital, the Montana State Hospital, and Providence-St. Patrick's Hospital in Missoula, MT, all took this specific type of action against this writer, 2011 (AZ), 2016 (MT, [Colby Wang]), and Missoula, 2019 (Jason Molinaro, Robert Munjal, Ira Gaddy).

      They seem to think a person cannot understand when they are being abused in this manner. This is patent ignorance flowing from age old prejudice towards mentally ill persons. They assume that we are not capable of calling about bad human behavior, and seem to forget, in fact, that they are human beings in fact, susceptible to the same weaknesses and ill-advised temptations that any person bears equally.

     It is like this, just like this. These people have been acting in the same way for just as long as they been in existence, here in the US and beyond. Acting superior to the people who come to them in trust, be that via government provided 'power' or the oft ill-advised American medical doctor. 

     But very exclusively, and here again, this is all about irrefutable behavioral patterns, the American psychiatrist is king of this particularly nefarious ant hill. They behave far worse than any other type medical provider this writer has thus far sought to trust. And only have psychiatrists most acted in ways to weaken my own trust of them.  

   ""Hegseth's comments are a reminder that govern-ment isn't always eager to show the human cost of war."

     Herein a very frightening similarity to the fact that the American psychiatrist has never been eager to discuss the costs imposed on mentally ill Americans forced by circumstance to survive the violence of the American streets. Scary as hell, in that these kind of people don't even shrug, in fact, prefer in any such cases to sit on their grimy ass hands. 

     They did not give a rat's ass in the early to mid 1970s, when 10s upon 10s of thousands of their own severely mentally ill patients were forced onto the American streets (RE: the failed promise of  'deinstitutionalization'). And they do not care today about the fact that limited access to longer term in-patient psychiatric care and treatment is again forcing 10s of thousands of their own patients onto the violent streets of our otherwise great nation, conditions that may be more violent that any point in the recent past.

     What might any of they say in response to this specific allegation? Regardless of the common sense elements underlying such claims? Neither the American Psychiatric Association nor the vast majority of its collective membership have ever been willing to offer sincere response to such suggestions. It's not what they do. 

Period.  Fuck.    

    It's as bad today as ever when it comes to the suffering of seriously mentally ill American citizens, arguably worse due to the current federal administration. And I attest that some number of today's any bad acting American psychiatrists are on the same page as men like white men like Trump and Hegseth.

Now for some meat to chaw upon.

   "In Search of an Evidence-based Role for Psychiatry"

    By John Reed, Olga Rudman, and Jacqui Dillon. March 28, 2016.

         "A dilemma for all of us who are struggling to broaden our undemanding of distress beyond simplistic, pessimistic, biogenetic ideology, and to improve our nation's public mental health services accordingly, is whether or to to soften our criticisms of psychiatry in the hope of reaching those those psychiatrists whose minds are not totally closed. 

     But doing so rests on the assumption that change can come from within the profession. For the last few decades examples of that are few and far between. Therefor, in this article, published in the open access journal "Future Science", we pull no punches. We do try, however, to demonstrate that our criticisms are evidence-based, in the traditional, research-oriented, meaning of that phrase. Two of us (Olga and Jacqui) also have another form of evidence, based on personal experience, of the urgent need for those who fund and manage mental health services to stop assuming that 'the doctor knows best' ".

     Note that its been just over ten years since this critical bit of truth was shared among validly qualified scientific experts. And if ever these is one thing that the American psychiatrist most rejects, that would be the personal expertness of people who come to them in hope of being treated like fully serving human beings.

      No, no way the needed change will come from "within the profession." Fact being, as per the record since the very early 20th century, is that the only time the profession has ever 'changed' has been due to demands of the American people, right up through the 1970s, when: A) the people said shut those fucking horror show hospitals down; and B) when the people demanded that homosexual and gay Americans be seen as human beings. 

         And while those things were needed, for goddamn sure, the hospitals were shUt down but there was nowhere for 10s upon 10s of thousands of severely mentally ill American to but onto the streets, as was discussed above, and as per my own vested experience in these accursed state managed mental hospitals, and beyond, and despite the APA now being headed by a gay freak-show psychiatrist who was not even born in the US, these doctors discriminate against mentally ill gay men and women on par with how they still discriminate against mentally ill persons, in general.

    On this closing note, then. These people are vermin with fancy titles and nice clothing, nothing more or less that that. I am sick of all that they still get away with. But oh so thankfully, as per the heightened attention on the fallacy of the psychiatric bible, the accursed DSM, today I see some hope, a fresh bit of hope. And as more real scientist continue to bust gaping holes in the this patently fake ass medical text, I am willing to hazard a guess that perhaps the American psychiatrist is coming to sense his own pending demise. 

    The APA's recent by-line in reaction to such attention, that they will now be solely publishing the statistical bullshit of the DSM on the internet don't mean shit. As I see it, they just want to make more difficult for the American people to really give a good look over.

     Aha, as per the usual, new appearances that are just as false as they have always been. The kind of people who only know to pose as this or that, who only know to assume that a college degree means they matter. Nope, I got my GED at the age of 29, and surprised nobody more than myself at getting very high grades throughout, right up to that point when my own untreated SMI came to interfere in my law school trajectory. Too bad, you fucks. I know the law well, I know the full breadth of civil rights law well as per the the authority of the CRA of 1964, and very much understand all Acts of the US Congress, not limited to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and 2008 revised ed., as well: Which tells us that discrimination towards mentally ill Americans extends to all public services, not limited to public mental health care services.          

   This conversation about the exclusivity of the psychiatric profession and psychiatric exceptionalism will continue. 

  Tomorrow then. The distinct gullibility of these people, and their weak ass susceptibility to easy to avoid- if you gots what it takes- sociopolitical influences of most any and all kinds. 

   “It just shows that in our country right now, health care has been politicized in a way that political messages are driving and impacting care — and not always for good,” said Dr. Susan Sirota, a pediatrician in Highland Park, Illinois, who wasn’t involved with the research.

    Yep, like taking candy from babies. _______________________

    Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted  flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.

    And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.

     _____________________________

Paolo Jack Reed.
Founder.
Stoner Woods/Red River.
Caddo Parish, LA.