"2026. PJ Reed. The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse."
Key terms or words: People like this suck.
"The wrath of American justice."
| Paolo Jack Reed. Kim Williams Nature Preserve. Missoula, MT. 2020. |
ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME, PLEASE, ANY AND ALL WHO MAY FEEL THE SAME PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT ME PERSONALLY:
paoloreed@gmail.com
________________________
March 05, 2026. By P. Jack Reed.
"Rural villagers are massacred. Nigerian military mostly shrugs."
This mirrors the American psychiatrist, who has full awareness of the suffering of their own patients forced onto the streets and those in state managed mental hospital, but act as though it is not their express duty to care.
Many things remain exclusive to the American psychiatric profession. As stated in out last, more of their own patients forced to live onto the streets that any other kind of medical doctor.
In this edition of this publication, we will further be look at some of the exclusive differences between the American psychiatric profession and other medical professionals in these United States.
Top of the list, of course, otherwise preventable deaths. Such as the brutal murder of April Mott after the people working for the Arizona State Hospital, doctors and administrators, willfully chose to cover up the escape of a known to be violent man who violently escaped from the Arizona State Hospital in summer, 2011. Had these doctors abided by the very well established Tarasoff principle that paved the foundation for the concepts of duty to warn, a paradox to the competing notion of safeguarding patient confidentiality, April Mot would still be alive today.
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California initially established the duty to warn in 1974, which was later replaced with the duty to protect following a rehearing in 1976.
This case began in the fall of 1968, proving ample time for all to understand, when Prosenjit Poddar (an Indian-American), a student at the University of California, met Tatiana Tarrasoff at a dance class. After Ms. Tarasoff kissed Mr. Poddar on New Year's Eve, he developed a very unsavory liking for Ms. Tarasoff; however, she did not reciprocate.
In 1969, Mr. Poddar started struggling mentally regarding the circumstances and began seeing a counselor at Cowell Memorial Hospital upon a friend's recommendation. In August 1969, during a counseling session, Mr. Poddar revealed to his psychologist, Dr. Lawrence Moore, that he intended to kill Ms. Tarasoff.
Dr. Moore informed campus police and requested they take him to a nearby hospital for an involuntary commitment. Those officers interviewed Mr. Poddar, but released him shortly thereafter.
Things really went sideways when a white male American psychiatrist named Harvey Powelson, the university's Director of Psychiatry, learned about the event, he ordered the destruction of all clinical notes and the letter that was sent to Campus police by Dr. Moore regarding Mr. Poddar.
Ms. Tarasoff, who had left the US for time, returned to the country in early October, 1969. On October 27, 1969, Mr. Poddar arrived at Ms. Tarasoff's home, shot her with a pellet gun, and stabbed her numerous time, causing her otherwise preventable death.
California authorities charged him with second-degree murder; however, 5 years later, Poddar was released on the condition that he immediately return to his home country of India. Noteworthy, as well, that Mr. Poddar was raised in first caste Indian family.
Tarasoff's parents filed a due lawsuit against the University of CA, leading in time to the Tarrasof I decision.
This ruling established that mental health providers in any nature of hospital setting worn potential victims. Now, in most American jurisdictions no later than 1971, the Tarasoff duty is defined as a duty on the part of mental health professionals to act on patient threats to all and any possible individuals. And although this breach of duty has, to date, only led to civil liability, a strong case should lead to criminal liability, as well.
What stronger legal case might there be specific to the very preventable death of Ms. Mott in late September, 2011? Mr. Murrieta was known even before his covered up escape to be very dangerous. And yet, not one of the psychiatrists working at ASH was duly charged in this matter. Fact is, in medical law and medical ethics, there is no more clear a duty on the books, to protect all Americans from foreseeable harm.
Rather than see this duty for what it is, those at the Arizona State Hospital relied upon the classic excuse for not reporting Murietta's on patient confidentially. Clearly, criminal charges should have been brought against Murietta's primary attending psychiatrist. Yet, as stated, they all got away with Ms. Mott's otherwise preventable death.
Yes, these kind of doctors pose grave risk of harm, not only to their own patients, but the general public as well. They lie and manipulate even established law to their own self-serving interest, which I find grossly unconscionable. Just as I strongly find it very fucking unconscionable for any American psychiatrist to turn a blind eye to the known abuses that still go on in state managed mental hospitals.
When Dr. Ira Gaddy stated to me, "You better hope you Neve wind up in the Mississippi State Hospital," he was admitting his knowledge of these abuses. And as such, he is a very unconscionable contemporary American psychiatrist, as are all others that do the same, turning a blind eye to reality itself.
To them, such behavior is only normal, and has been proven to me, at least some number of them still believe that mentally ill Americans should expect to be abused by these kind of doctors.
It's revolting on its face, that one kind of doctor, and one only, would so blatantly care so little about all mentally ill Americans equally. They are deeply out touch with reality, as I see it herein. They act as though they believe they can still get away with whatever the fuck they want.
This must come to an end. It remains inexcusable, and wholly unjustified. This is less about any such established legal standards than it about the kind of doctor who give no shit about the health and safety interests of their seriously mentally ill and disabled American patients.
I will continue to do all I can in defense of the never yet enforced civil and human rights of mentally ill Americans. I am learning from many others that they too are well aware of the fact that these kind of doctors all but openly abuse their own patients at will.
It's not as though these kind of doctors are not aware of this standard of law. Nope, all they care about are themselves, highly selfish and patently uncaring about at risk and highly vulnerable human beings. They see us as damaged goods, and cannot believe that many mentally ill Americans possess reasonable intelligence, or worse yet in there eyes, may be just as smart, maybe even smarter than they.
I am one such, highly intelligent and all to well aware of the fact that there remain many bad acting American psychiatrists running around the US today.
It really is 2026. It is not the 1960s, nor the 1970s, nor the 1980s, nor the 1990s. It is fucking 2026, and yet, they continue to refuse to change their fucked up behaviors, very acting as though they are still in the long ago past. I know as much, and have no reason to trust any American psychiatrist in these United States at time of this writing.
My role today, lots of hard work to do. But I am very much up to it. Fuck these many bad acting American psychiatrists. Fuck them until thier eye pop out of their boneheads, pieces of shit they still remain today, and surely will tomorrow. The need is real for the American people to again raise their voices and tell these people to act like responsible American citizens.
And we will soon look at the same. The exclusively bad behaviors of all too many contemporary American psychiatrists.
Note: The editor and founder of this publication, P. Jack Reed, offers his services today as an expert witness specific to either civil actions, or better yet, criminal prosecutions of American psychiatrists subject to such prosecution in our otherwise great nation's criminal courts. In this latter sense, I ask no more than straight up costs with no nature of fee arrangement; while in the former case, a contracted flat fee grounded in possible awards via a successful civil action, no more than 6% depending upon the specific issues most at stake.
And yes, since this public blog was first published in April, 2012, a justifiable and wholly righteous process that did serve to bring about long past due federal oversight and intervention specific to the hospital wide corruption and the bad acting American psychiatrists working for the Arizona State Hospital circa 2011-2015, nothing has changed in lasting fashion.
_____________________________
![]() |
| Paolo Jack Reed. Founder. Stoner Woods/Red River. Caddo Parish, LA. |
