This a rerun of an article written almost four months ago. I am adding it to this weeks articles because I just got done reading through administrative law Judge Kay Abramsohn's ruling and recommendation specific to when the issues underlying the above case #2012c-BHS-0338-DHS were presented to her at hearing on July 16, 2012. In sum, the judge chose to dismiss my concerns as unsubstantiated, this despite a substantial body of evidence that included lengthy testimony from a very experienced and highly reputable human rights advocate and expert witness, John Gallagher (now a doctoral candidate in ASU's social work program), and a reasonable amount of well founded documentation in support of my central allegations in the case. Hardly a surprise and only somewhat disappointing, this dismissal (for it only further confirms the unbalanced and grossly inequitable state of affairs specific to the grievance process that I am dedicated to reforming), but it is not over yet. I have at least three immediate options, and in the next few days, I will counsel the matter with my associates, and make a decision as to what comes next within a week or two.
SUNDAY, JUNE 17, 2012 (RERUn)
Wherein, following over one full year of systematic suppression of my right to due process in relation to a criminally imposed sequence of administrative abuse of authority at The Arizona State Hospital, I prepare to go to hearing.
I owe John Gallagher of the Arizona Department of Health Services Office of Human of Rights (ADHS OHR) an enormous amount of gratitude. His compilation of directly applicable statutory facts in terms of the numerous unlawful actions imposed on me in specific relation to this matter opened my eyes to the reality that The Arizona State Hospital is highly regulated by a fairly comprehensible body of easily accessible rules and regulations. Er, law and policy, that is, and given my background in law,John Gallagher inadvertently, yet directly, contributed to putting me back on track with my deepest convictions as a man in such a manner as to furthermore revive my familiarity with something that I put a fair amount of time and energy into, albeit in what seems to me as another life.
So far as my vivid recollections of childhood go, particularly with respect for suicidal thinking, I have determined by now, after years (literally!) of formal hospitalization in certified insane asylums, that I possess a keen sense of self awareness, and that in direct combination with related observational skills, I recall these things as if not more clearly than most people do their own respective childhood years; this fact was affirmed and reaffirmed by several of my therapists between 2010-2012, and these residual memories have long fostered my deepest sense of identity as it stands even today.
My most seriously debilitating encounters with major
Hence, my arrival in the shit hole known as ASH. When I had first settled into my new "life" as a possibly long term mental patient in Tucson, May, 2010, I was both cynical to a point of feeling that no man would ever be able to convince me of why I should choose life over death, as well as vastly departed from the sentient realities of my professional training and other life experiences. But these specific traits of my disorder subsided somewhat over the course of my first six months in-hospital (an acquired state of balance that I attribute to the good doctors and and staff at the University of Arizona Medical Center in Tucson, as well as to my therapist as St. Mary's Hospital, Shari Healey); and when I arrived at ASH on January 11, 2011, I was feeling relatively centered, at least in terms of what I felt I needed to do as a patient, with both my own treatment goals in mind as well as what I fairly felt I could expect from my caregivers.
Below are several key pages from the grievance document that John Gallagherof the ADHS Office of Human Rights assembled on my behalf, pages that represent the sorts of training I had been involved with as a legal professional, and which, as such, served to point me in the direction I am in today, fighting as I am for the rights and needs of ASH patients as they stand today. Note, if you will, that there are at least six specific violations of law cited, statutory law relating to my fundamental rights as a client and human being that directly flows from the text and and language of theArizona Administrative Code, Article 9, Chapter 21, sections 201 and 202. The incidents of wrongdoing evidenced by these violations are broad, and yet well detailed, for as I said at the outset of this article, there is an easily accessible body of comprehensible rules and regulations applicable to this matter. Unless you are a patient at ASH, that is, are they easily accessible. Note, as well, that details included below in the Conclusion clearly identify Cindy Froelich, an employee of the Arizona Attorney General's Office (at least to the extent that in her capacity as a secretary in the ASH' legal office, Cindy Froelich works directly under the authority of assistant AZ Attorney General Joel "the mortician" Rudd.), as an immediate party to the grievance's central elements of allegation. Therein, the basis of my firm rejection of having Joel Rudd and the Office of Arizona Attorney General in any way involved as the representative counsel for the appellee in this case; for indeed, Joel Rudd and Cindy Froelich engaged in some of the most critically unlawful actions taken against me in this matter, between the dates of May 25-29, 2011. They willfully abused their given authority and manipulated public resources in terms of creating a frailly long and technical court document, which was a blatant waste of taxpayer money as well as a severe threat of to my status as a patient-client status at that time.
Finally, on the last page below, please see the suggested Solution that John Gallagher carefully crafted in order to bring about a reasonable resolution to the matter at hand. This is an especially important aspect of the document, for therein one sees nothing more complex than a straightforward and good faith request for reasonable oversight of the issues raised in this matter. Especially important today, because of the basic fact that ASH' and ADHS's blatant refusal(s) to cooperate in this matter graphically represents the endemic problems underlying the administrative abuses that I have worked to make clear in my writing. These people have no interest whatsoever in meaningfully responding to patient concerns, particularly not if and when those concerns directly involve allegations of patient abuse and staff misconduct. As follows:
IN CLOSING: I hope that tomorrow I will see a response from the administrative law judge in this case about my motion to have Joel Rudd formally removed as representative counsel in these proceedings, which I submitted to the court on Friday (see June 15, 2012, "RE:"). This is increasingly becoming a search and destroy sort of campaign, in the sense that as my acquisition of more and more evidence in terms of the ongoing abuse of patients and related abuses of clinical and administrative abuse of authority at The Arizona State Hospital, I am increasingly willing to target the specific representatives who do, at this time, need to be held fully accountable under the law. At this time. Not tomorrow, not in three or six months. Now.
What a great time this is to get on board with this cause. A moderately deep increase in cash flow to the needs of Arizona's mental heath clients in the outpatient community came about in recent months, and the attorney generals' office is taking quite a bit of heat in relation to their own lawlessness right now. A great time, indeed, for anyone with a sense of conscience to do their part in fighting the abuse of patients at The Arizona State Hospital, and beyond. Please, get involved, take action, help make a difference today.
(NOTE: This is an October 6, 2012, rerun of an article published in June, 2012)
paoloreed@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would really love input of any kind from anybody with any interest whatsoever in the issues that I am sharing in this blog. I mean it, anybody, for I will be the first one to admit that I may be inaccurately depicting certain aspects of the conditions
at ASH, and anonymous comments are fine. In any case, I am more than willing to value anybody's feelings about my writing, and I assure you that I will not intentionally exploit or otherwise abuse your right to express yourself as you deem fit. This topic is far, far too important for anything less. Thank you, whoever you are. Peace and Frogs.