Monday, September 30, 2013

Statistical Update, September 30, 2013: The Arizona State Hospital and Patient Abuse



In the last two weeks, the blog has accrued over 2,000 dedicated visits, which translates to an average of 140 such visits per day. Hard to say where the bulk of this traffic is coming from, but it is clear that something is in the works; and in this context, things are definitely looking up in terms of exposing the grossly substandard conditions at The Arizona State Hospital, as they stand today. 

Likewise, there is a decent amount of related info flowing in from outside media sources who are taking an increased interest not so much in my work (not exclusively my in work, that is), but in the heightened evidence that is emerging in local (to Phoenix) media, and other like sources of public discourse. Herein the power of communication in practice and effect. And as has been the norm for over 18 months, the only dissenters in terms of my work- rare but valuable nonetheless- are individuals who claim to work at ASH. Thankfully, I have more than one friend on staff at ASH, each of whom I have full faith in (and they know who they are), persons on nursing and technician staff who have worked at ASH for at least 10 years; and I can attest to the fact that these individuals stand out in contrast to the majority of ASH staff, are jewels- in fact- when it comes to the overall situation there. From several of these individuals, I have received clear votes of support over the long months now behind the life of the blog itself, and therein I find some of the requisite confidence to keep plowing ahead- in spite of the rest. When the smoke clears, as it were, I fully anticipate improvements in both the patient as well as the employment experience(s) at ASH, and those staff not up to the task will effectively be phased out.

AT THIS CRITICAL JUNCTURE IN TIME, I FEEL IT PRUDENT TO DIRECT YOUR ENERGY TO THE FEDERAL AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING PUBLIC ENTITIES SUCH AS THE ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL. THESE INCLUDE:

(A)
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division.
This agency has the utmost authority in terms of the fact that as per the provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act, each and every patient at ASH is due full protection as seriously mentally ill and disabled American citizens, and yet, ASH patients as a whole are graphically discriminated against on the basis of their given disability(s), including in the context of ongoing physical and psychological/emotional abuses that we we would never see in other public facilities. Therein, direct application of the patent discriminations that are banned by the ADA and other like federal enactments.

ADDRESS: 

U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main
Washington, DC 20530

ACTING ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jocelyn Samuels
Civil Rights Division (202) 514-4609

(B)
The Department of Health and Human Services
Office for Civil Rights. This is the federal agency responsible for responding to good faith reports specific to civil rights violations as per the dictate of both the Americans With Disabilities Act, and the Hospital Information Portability and Protection Act (HIPPA). As such, they can serve in terms of initiating investigations about ASH administrations' willful denial of patient' access to their own personal medical records, which I know for a fact do contain meaningful data specific to the substandard clinical practices at ASH. In order to cover up such data,ASH administrators-including ASH's primary legal counsel, AZ Assistant Attorney General Joel "the mortician" Rudd-hide behind HIPPA as a matter of standard practice, and this is in direct contradiction to the purpose of the HIPPA act in itself.


ADDRESS: 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Room 509F, HHH Building
Washington, D.C. 20201

For all other non-privacy related inquiries to OCR, including comments or questions about OCR's web site, please send an email to OCRMail@hhs.gov


In addition, we have a pre-recorded message with useful information about OCR:
toll-free:  (800) 368-1019
TDD toll-free:  (800) 537-7697

( C)
The Joint Commission which plays a central role in authorizing and licensing hospital facilities such as ASH, and as such, has an obligation to the public in terms of responding to good faith reports specific to conditions and care practices at such public entities.  

  • Address: 
  • The Joint Commission
    One Renaissance Blvd.
    Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181

    Washington DC Office
    601 13th Street, NW
    Suite 560 South
    Washington, DC 20005 


  • Customer Service: 630-792-5800pao
  • Account Executive: 630-792-3007


  • Fax number: 630-792-5005

------------------------------------------------------

Go get 'em, people!


IN CLOSING:  THANK YOU TO ALL WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS PROCESS TO DATE. THE PATIENTS AT ASH NEED OUR HELP, AND THE ONLY WAY TO PROVIDE THIS IS THROUGH ACTIVE PARTICIPATION, HOWEVER THAT BEST FITS YOUR COMFORT ZONE. MEANWHILE, THE SITE "ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL AND PATIENT ABUSE" NEEDS MORE FOLLOWERS IN ORDER TO FURTHER GENERATE ENERGY. SO PLEASE CONTINUE TO SUBMIT COMMENTARY, WHICH I AGREE TO KEEP 100% CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR REACH OUT IN YOUR OWN RIGHT TO THE APPROPRIATE AUTH0RITIES, AS INCLUDED ABOVE, AND IN MY APRIL 2012 "RESOURCE IDEAS" ARTICLE.

paoloreed@gmail.com

Sunday, September 29, 2013

RERUN/REWRITE

AS A MATTER OF UPDATING THE THEME OF THIS ARTICLE, WHICH I PUBLISHED ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO, I WILL JUST STATE THAT THE TURNOVER OF MID AND LOWER LEVEL STAFF AT THE ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL IS ASTONISHINGLY HIGH. WITH THIS FACT IN MIND, THE BELOW MENTIONED PATIENT ADVOCATE, SONYA SERDA, IS NO LONGER FILLING THAT POSITION AT ASH. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, SHE WAS PHASED OUT, AS IT WERE, IN COORDINATION WITH THE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF FORMER ASH SUPERVISOR, CORY NELSON, AS PER HIS HIRING IN AUGUST, 2012. MORE IMPORTANTLY, THERE IS NO CURRENT PATIENT ADVOCATE WHATSOEVER AT ASH, WHICH EFFECTIVELY DENOTES THE FACT THAT THINGS THERE HAVE GOTTEN EVEN WORSE SINCE MY FEBRUARY, 2012, DISCHARGE FROM ASH.

Corrupt Social Worker Staff At The Arizona State Hospital: Wherein I Again Initiate Contact With The The AZ Board Of Behavioral Health Examiners

THIS ARTICLE DIRECTLY RELATES TO AN APRIL 18, 2012, ARTICLE OF THE SAME TITLE, AS WELL MY JUNE 06, 2012: The Role Of State Ombudsperson At The Arizona State Hospital: "The typically mismanaged evolution of a patient grievance report at The Arizona State Hospital." (Sonya Serda, photo left)

Auditors find fault in behavioral health board.
                                                                                                           
September 01, 2012 5:00 am  •  HOWARD FISCHER Capitol Media Services
PHOENIX -- The board responsible for protecting the public from bad counselors and non-medical therapists is slow to handle complaints, state Auditor General Debra Davenport said Friday. In a report to the Legislature, Davenport said more than half the complaints closed by the Board of Behavioral Health Examiners in the last two years were not resolved within six months, the standard generally used to evaluate how all regulatory boards do their jobs. And she said the issue is more than academic.
        "Lengthy complaint resolution times can put public safety at risk because licensees can continue practicing unchecked until the board takes action," Davenport said.
        In a formal response to the report, Debra Rinaudo, the board's executive director, said her agency already is working to implement changes suggested. The board regulates and licenses counselors who work with individuals and families to treat mental, behavior and emotional problems, marriage and family therapists, social workers who provide services through various organizations and schools, and substance abuse counselors who specialize in addiction prevention, treatment, recovery support and education.

     Oh, man, oh man! You best hold on to your hats, Robert Washington, and all the rest of you bottom feeding ASH social workers, particularly the supervisors in that department (including Laura, or Lara, or whatever the hell your name is), because I have a record of very well founded complaints that I made to the AZ Board of Behavioral Health Examiners about your departments' staff-wide willingness to engage in graphic violations my constitutional rights when I was hospitalized at ASH from early January, 2011, to late February, 2012. 
     Upon reading yesterday's news report in the Flagstaff Daily Sun (cited above, in part) about the failure of the AZ Board of Behavioral Health Examiners (BBHE) to dutifully follow the provisional rules applicable to investigations of such complaints, I gained a far better idea of why it is that I have not, to date, heard back form the Board about my complaints, and any concerns I had about this delay have been put at ease. 

BACKGROUND
     The social workers at The Arizona State Hospital play a central role in any/all patients' relationship with the greater world outside of ASH, particularly with respect for discharge planning and other non-medical aspects of the patients status while hospitalized there. As such, they are the patients' direct line of authority in terms of processing one's life as discharge from ASH and entry back into society approaches, and the social worker therein has pretty clear obligations in terms of granting the patient as much practical hope as may be possible in this context. In my experience, however, the social workers at ASH that I interacted with most closely (including several supervisory staff) blatantly engaged in abusing the flow of procedure specific to my personal discharge planning and directly related efforts to establish my needs as this process evolved over a period of about 7 months. On more than one occasion, I was denied access to personal records, for example, in gross defiance of my rights as provided in The Hospital Information and Portability Act, a matter that is still being considered in an ongoing investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights. On another occasion, my assigned ASH social worker, Robert Washington, and a senior social services staff member named Veneranda Heffern, denied me the right to have a personal representative of my choice present at a very critical discharge planning meeting, also known as a "staffing," an act that was in gross violation of my most fundamental rights as a person, patient, and consumer; at the time, it was clear to me that their respective intent was to deny me full self determination and independent representation as a matter of conducting themselves however the hell they wanted to with no fear of oversight or accountability and in direct defiance of my clear requests in this context, and their behavior at the time made me feel as though I had no rights and was worthless and below them as a human being. Very serious stuff in terms of well established health care ethics, law, and policy. The full list of obvious social worker misconduct that I documented while hospitalized at ASH is quite a bit longer, and I am now in a position (thanks to the news report cited above) to delve a bit more aggressively into seeing that my concerns about such misconduct are addressed in a meaningful manner. 
     Likewise, when it comes to the role of the hospital "patient advocate," Sonya Serda, there are at least 9 unresolved patient grievances (complaints) that I filed in the latter months of my time at ASH, in good faith and in full compliance with standard protocol; issues that are only "unresolved" because they are grievance reports that Sonya Serda never responded to. The patient advocate at ASH is any patients' first and only direct avenue for seeking redress when they are subject to abuse or any other like form of staff misconduct; as such, Sonya Serda represents herself as being trustworthy and compassionate about patient wellbeing, a representation which I regrettably found to be false. And with the 9 aforementioned unresolved grievances in mind, the applicable time limits are far past, and the safety of the patients is at risk because the misbehaving staff who I reported have been allowed to "continue practicing unchecked…." As such, my right(s) to meaningful redress and relief in relation to these grievances have also been and are still being grossly violated in a manner that I feel is 100% consistent with the concerns that the State Auditor's office expressed about the risks associated with delays in such grievance and complaint responses, as follows (from above): "Lengthy complaint resolution times can put public safety at risk because licensees can continue practicing unchecked until the board takes action." It is obvious to me that Serda and her superiors have come to assume that because I am no longer a patient at ASH, I have chosen to leave those issues unaddressed. But nothing could be farther from the truth. I am not dead, after all, and that's pretty much what it is going to take before I back off on my dedication to seeing that oversight and accountability be applied in direct relation to all and any of my personal experiences at ASH. As always, I have full copies of all such grievance reports, and I am well prepared today in terms of knowing what to do about the fact that my rights in this context are still being violated by Sonya Serda and her cohorts in the administrative offices at ASH.  

ANALYSIS
     The patterns of failure to meet their basic obligations that I witnessed in terms of the social worker staff I closely interacted with at ASH were directly condoned by executive staff such as former Chief Medical Officer Dr. Steven Dingle during this time; on at least three specific occasions, members of the social services staff, including Megan Mischer, Robert Washington, and a social services supervisor named Laura (or Lara?), immediately deferred to Dingle when I pointed out the fact that their conduct was in direct violation of hospital rules, as well as provisions of the Arizona Administrative Code and the Arizona Constitution. 

Robert Washington, (my last assigned ASH social worker) made clear statements to this same effect at the very end of my time at ASH, when I lawfully requested copies of my personal medical records, which I was planning to include in my own personal records as I moved forward towards outpatient care, etc., this just before I was scheduled to discharge on February 21, 2012; at that time. I did at that time fill out and submitted a standard ASH/ADHS form request for these records, but even this simple a request was denied, which Washington later advised me of (on the day before my actual discharge), as follows:

"They refused to do grant you those records."                                         
     'Who?' I asked.                                                                                          
"Administration, that's who. They told me that they were not going to provide you with any of your records at this time."    

He advised of this in as smug and unprofessional a manner as I might imagine, 100% consistent the fact that ASH's senior staff willfully walk all over the most fundamental rights of the patient community in general, and as such, an astoundingly clear expression of ASH administrations' willingness to look me in the eye and say:

 "You and your claim of fundamental rights to dignity and self determination mean nothing to us. We don't care, and there is nothing you can do about it." 

Any patents own medical records are that persons property. Period. And nobody at ASH or anywhere else in the health care industry have the right to deny a persons access to such records. This is textbook stuff, in essence. But at ASH, I experienced these same basic themes of utter disrespect and disregard for my fundamental human rights as a patient, tax paying consumer, and human being at all levels of interaction with ASH staff for over 13 full months of time. I attest to this fact, and I look forward to stating my ongoing concerns about these people when the time comes in a formally convened court of law. 
     Dr. Steven Dingle, meanwhile, has been promoted within the ADHS system of behavioral health care (a very disturbing thought, in my opinion, and a fact that I intend to address as my advocacy in defense of patient rights in AZ evolves); and my one time social worker, Megan Mischer, left ASH at just about that time that I filed a formal report with The AZ Board of Behavioral Health Examiners about her engagement in criminal abuse of my rights as a patient, person, and consumer in the state of Arizona. I have always suspected that Mischer heard me when I told in her in no uncertain terms: "You have been doing this for some time, and you know as well as I do that you are tending to my discharge affairs in direct violation of law and policy". I went so far in those conversations to show her the specific statutory laws that applied to my concerns at the time, and she always deferred her unwillingness to offer me comprehensive response about these matters to "her bosses." She saw it, I feel, that the one's behind the criminal misconduct at ASH were far behind their due consequences, so she split.  
     That is the way it goes at The Arizona State Hospital: 

Substandard mental-medical health care and blatant disregard for well established law and policy specific to patient rights, all as a matter of standard practice at all levels of staff.  

IN CLOSING: You can be sure that I'll be in touch with Debra Rinaudo of The Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners as soon as I possibly can. But where does this end? Are the realities of criminal conduct and substandard mental-medical care and practice at The Arizona State Hospital so deeply embedded in the state system that nothing short of absolute revolution in terms of reform in the behavioral health care network will suffice as a matter of cleaning things up? ADHS' Director Will Humble has made it clear to me that he is not going to respond to these concerns. Clearly, federal oversight and intervention is necessary, and my ongoing work in this context has increasingly led me into conversations with federal agency workers who are, in effect, bound to take action once they have to. But, I am still falling short in certain terms of what it will take to get the Fed fully on board with my cause, but that is ok. The time will come, and anyone familiar with federal agencies knows that everything takes an inordinate amount of time. 
     That said, I will just have to keep it up. The rat bastards at ASH and in the administrative offices of the department of health, and so on, seemingly anoint themselves with the stink of corruption and criminality at every turn in the road; this is exemplified quite clearly by these ever emerging news reports in relation to just about every high ranking official in the Arizona state government. So we will just allow them- the ranking officials most responsible for seeing to the deepest needs of Arizona's citizens- continue to self implode as a matter of their fundamental ineptitude and related incompetence; and I will be there to expedite the process as best I can, as it all goes down. 

     Professor Joseph "Smokin' Joe" Livermore (UA Law) once told me: "Criminals tend to be pretty stupid as a rule. That's why the bulk of them end up in jail. Or worse." And as I continue to embark on seeking humane reform in relation to my defense of the rights of the patients at The Arizona State Hospital, running as I do into roadblocks at every juncture which seemingly highlight the unwillingness of affiliated state employees to simply do their jobs, I am increasingly reminded of Prof. Livermore's words in this context. Consistent with the presence of immoral and unethical mental-medical care at ASH, I recognize an insidious lack of common sensibility in the practices of Joel "the mortician" Rudd (of the Arizona Attorney Generals' office), as well as in the characteristics of ASH supervisor Cory"crazycorycorner" Nelson (illustrated no more clearly than by the home page of his personal website), and Arizona Department of Health Services Will Humble (as exemplified by his blatant unwillingness to openly communicate with the public- people like me, his actual clientele). It is freakishly unrepresentative of what I know to be the well established standards of modern American society and culture, an aberration of decent and humane behavior that may, indeed, meet the definition of socially sanctioned psychopathy: People in power doing whatever they have to preserve their selfish and socially immoral ways, and to Hell with the impacts of this behavior on the one's relying on their authority, etc. Please come to the aid of ASH' seriously mentally ill patients today. The administrators and clinicians at ASH operate at a level of graphical substandard mental health care, and they are getting away with it lock-stock-and barrel. Patient abuse is inhumane, cruel, and unacceptable in every sense of the word.
-------

Perpetrating The Most Fraudulent Abuse Of Public Services in The History of Arizona August 03, 2012

I will say it once, as loudly as I can:
You, Mr. Will Humble, are on the verge of something that no reasonable man should ever have to bring upon themselves. Why, why, why, don't you do the right thing? You have any number of avenues by which to bring light to the truths underlying your administrations' failure to address the mismanagement of Arizona's sole long term public mental health facility. What in the hell are you doing, ignoring good faith staff reports, and allowing the administrative misconduct at ASH go on to the extent that it is obviously has at this time? Are you really this shortsighted in your scope as a state official? People are clearly suffering very real harm as a direct consequence of these issues. 

           
 Am I- are we- talking to a brick wall here? 

Please, please, please step to the plate and fulfill your obligations to the citizens of Arizona and your clientele within the Arizona Department of Behavioral Health Services. 
   
End of story. 

paoloreed@gmail.com



Friday, September 27, 2013

DISCUSSION: "VICTIM'S FAMILY QUESTIONS WHY MAN WAS FREE."

"THERE IS  A DUTY TO WARN…. A REQUIREMENT WE ALL LIVE WITH." Barry Rose, manager, Salt Lake County/University of Utah Neuropsychiatric Institute (see below, as quoted in an Associated Press article written by Paul Foy, published in The Washington Post newspaper on Setpember 24, 2013)

The following article, published only yesterday, September 24, 2013, confirms my contention that administrative staff at The Arizona State Hospital did in fact violate established law and policy specific to their required obligation to do everything within their power to protect the public from threat posed by Jesus Murietta, at that point in time and in the subsequent days/weeks following his violent escape from the ASH, in late May, 2011. Not only were these persons aware of the fact that Murietta is a very violent and potentially lethal threat to others, but as importantly, that he has history of serious suicide attempts. Throughout the entirety of his treatment at ASH (as well as per in terms of his prior mental health records), Murietta's established behavioral characteristics were known to include psychotic breaks that would generally lead to him physically attacking others (patients and staff, alike); and in fact, on one occasion less than 30 days prior to his escape from ASH, Mureitta very violently assaulted and beat a female ASH patient, who is in fact restricted to a wheel chair, an incident with undeniably clarifies his instability at the time. In the initial 7-10 days after his escape, and the willful coverup of the escape by ASH administrators, Murietta was positively identified by ASH administrators as having stalked and verbally threatened the life and family of a female member of ASH's housekeeping staff, who for some reason failed to report that incident in her own right to police, and instead reported it to ASH administration, effectively asking them to do whatever they felt reasonable under those circumstances. I feel safe in presuming that the housekeeper was afraid for her job, and that this is why she chose to take this highly critical information to ASH administration, rather than Phoenix police. In any case, instead of following through on even that specific dynamic of the cycle of violence as it played out, ASH administrators again refused to share these details with Phoenix police, or any other like public resource upon whom the greater public rely when such issues arise in relation to the corrections system, the behavioral health system, and so on. As the excerpts below prove, ASH staff as whole have a very real duty to report any such threats posed to the public, in general; but as per the data that I and other like public information sources have clearly illustrated to date, as matter of standard practice, the one's running ASH and caring of the well being of Arizona's most seriously mentally ill adults have an established history of refusing to meet this most fundamental element of their given responsibility(s).


Man accused of plot to shoot up Salt Lake mall



     Police first learned of the plan Aug. 12 when a West Valley police officer was dispatched to Pioneer Valley Hospital by a crisis worker. At that point, investigators began looking into Stiles' background. Family members told investigators the man had a history of mental illness and making threats, the district attorney said….

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/09/24/3647648/man-accused-of-plot-to-shoot-up.html#storylink=cpy

      Barry Rose, who manages Salt Lake County's crisis line at the University of Utah's Neuropsychiatric Institute, said the crisis worker handled the situation correctly.
     
         "Confidentiality goes out the window when somebody makes a credible threat to hurt others….

 ….There is a duty to warn. It is a requirement that we all live with."

  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    IN TERMS OF THE COVER UP OF JESUS MURIETTA'S VIOLENT ESCAPE FROM THE ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL IN MAY, 20122- THERE YOU HAVE IT:

     "Confidentiality goes out the window when somebody makes a credible threat to hurt others. 

    "There is a duty to warn… a requirement that we all live with…"

This is an established standard of care that applies throughout the American mental health 
care system, and has common sense merit that extends beyond the presence of formal edict and policy. At this point in time, the American public is reeling from the lingering impacts of several mass shootings that share the dynamics underlying the murder of April Mott. But in this specific case, we precisely know who is at fault, due oversight and accountability, and subject to all aspects of applicable law. And yet, in relation to ASH and management level staff in the ADHS/BHS construct, each and every one of these individuals is still employed by the taxpayers, highly paid and functioning in relation to public mental health care in Arizona.

As a matter of practicality, I will restate my primary concerns that arose as soon as I learned that Jesus Murietta had violently escaped ASH in late May, 2011, and in the following 2 days. There were three, as such, and they were very specific, as follows:
      1) I had immediate concern for Murietta's safety, for along with his known violent behavioral characteristics, he also has a very real history of lethal suicide attempts, which are readily evident in the form of deep scar tissue directly across his throat and both of his wrists; likewise, the simple fact that he had fled ASH at night, and into the very dangerous environment of central Phoenix with nothing but the clothes on his back- literally- also led me to worry about Jesus' safety and basic well being at that very time that I first learned of his escape (the previous night).
      2) Given Murietta's established behavioral characteristics specific to violence directed towards other , which I had witnessed in a Tucson area mental facility prior to ASH, as well as at ASH itself in the months before the escape, I had immediate concern for the general threat posed to the greater public
     3) At that time that I learned of the escape (the following morning) I had every reason to expect that the administrators of ASH were up to the fundamental task of alerting the police and providing them as much relevant information as possible in terms of Murietta's known state of mind and related behavioral characteristics. But within 48 or so hours of the escape, I learned that ASH administrators had failed to meet this most basic of obligations to the public, and therein I sensed the presence of a very real cover up, which I knew to be 100% against the law. I sensed, as such, that these people were intending to avoid the required oversight that applies to such events (escape(s) of violent patients, etc.), which compelled me to contact the editorial staff of the Arizona Republic newspaper on the the 3rd day after the escape.
  
     NOTE: In  the subsequent 4-6 days after my contacting the newspaper in order to report Murietta's  escape, when reporter J.J. Hensley contacted the administrative staff at ASH in order to confirm this, he was advised that:

NO ESCAPE HAD OCCURRED.

    - The entirety of my account is a matter of record, including this last detail ("Note"). Consequent to the fact that reporter Hensley was lied to in this context, he was unable to confirm my report, and my credibility as a citizen seeking to report such critical information was thrown in question. I was, after all, JUST ANOTHER ASH PATIENT. Thus, as per the undeniable presence of stigma and associated discrimination towards seriously mentally ill persons, the reality of this issue was shrouded by the willingness of ASH administrators to defy the public's due need in this context, which further violated my status as an American and person in terms of voice, equal protection, and self determination, as spelled out in state, federal, and international human rights law.

THE SHARED RESPONSIBILITY AND RELATED ACCOUNTABILITY IN THIS MATTER CANNOT BE OVERSTATED, FOR AT  THAT POINT IN TIME THAT THE SENIOR CLINICIANS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND ASSOCIATED EXECUTIVE STAFF WERE IN A POSITION TO PROVIDE REASONABLE PROTECTION TO THE GREATER PUBLIC, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE VIOLENT ESCAPE OF A PATIENT UNDER THEIR CARE, EACH AND EVERY ONE THEM WILLFULLY CONCEALED THE FACT THAT THIS HIGHLY DANGEROUS PERSON WAS AT LARGE IN THE GREATER PHOENIX COMMUNITY. AS SUCH, THE WELFARE OF BOTH THE PUBIC, AS WELL AS THE PATIENT, WAS ILLEGALLY PUSHED ASIDE IN ORDER FOR THESE PEOPLE TO AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY. AS A GROUP, THESE PEOPLE PUT THEIR OWN SELFISH INTERESTS BEFORE THAT OF THE PUBLIC, WILLING AS SUCH TO ACCEPT WHATEVER CONSEQUENCES WOUDL ARISE IN RELATION TO THIS SELFISHNESS, AND I CONTEND THAT EACH AND EVERY ONE THEM KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING AT THE TIME. IN TERMS OF THE CRIMINALITY THAT I CONTEND APPLIES IN THIS CASE, THE UNDENIABLY WILLFUL NATURE OF THEIR ACTION(S) EXTEND BEYOND NEGLIGENCE, FOR AS I HAVE STRIVED TO EXPLAIN IN NUMEROUS ESSAYS AND ARTICLES TO DATE, THOSE PERSONS AT ASH WITH THE MOST DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY  OVER THE FACILITY'S GENERAL OPERATION- RESPONSIBILITY AFFORDED THEM THROUGH THE PUBLIC TRUST AS PER THEIR CLAIMED QUALIFICATIONS, INC. EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE- DID DELIBERATELY DISTORT THE FACTUAL DETAILS UNDERLYING THIS MATTER AS IT OCCURRED AND CONTINUED TO PLAY OUT, WHICH IS TANTAMOUNT TO AN OBVIOUS MANIPULATION OF THE EXPRESS INTENT AND PURPOSE OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW(S) SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO PROTECT AMERICA'S PUBLIC AS A WHOLE. THESE INDIVIDUALS FURTHER WENT SO FAR AS TO HIDE BEHIND SUCH STANDARDS OF LAW, INCLUDING THE HOSPITAL INFORMATION ACT (e.g.- BY REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NO PERSON/PATIENT'S PRIVACY RIGHTS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE INTERESTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC) IN ORDER TO AVOID REQUIRED OVERSIGHT, WHICH WE THE PUBLIC REASONABLY EXPECT TO BE CONTINUOUSLY IN EFFECT. AND AS ILLUSTRATED IN ALL FACETS OF CURRENT MEDIA REPORTS, AS WELL AS MY OWN SHARED DATA SPECIFIC TO THESE ISSUES, EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE PEOPLE ARE 100% GUILTY OF DEFYING THE ABOVE CITED CRITERIA, WHICH INCLUDES THE EXPRESS DUTY TO REPORT ANY KNOWN THREAT(S) TO THE PUBLIC. THE DELIBERATE DISTORTION DESCRIED HEREIN IS DECEPTION THROUGH AND THROUGH, AND IS LITERALLY MAINTAINED ON A DAILY BASIS BY THE ENTIRE EXECUTIVE STAFF AT ASH- IS IN FACT A MATTER OF STANDARD PRACTICE THERE. FOR AS PROVEN BY THE REOCRD AS IT STANDS TODAY AND CONTINUES TO EVOVLE, THE ONE'S DIRECTLY ASSOCIATED WITH UNLAWFUL COVER UP OF MURIETTA'S ESCAPE ARE STILL ACTING  AS SENIOR LEVEL CLINICIANS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF AT ASH, AND BEYOND IN THE AHDS/BHS SYSTEM- INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
                                                                                                                

    -(then) interim ASH Supervisor Ann Froio;                                               
  -(then) ASH Chief Medical Officer Dr. Steven Dingle (since promoted within the ADHS/BHS framework!);                                                                   
    - ASH Chief Operating Officer Donna Noriega (who is at this very time the acting Supervisor at ASH!);                                                                            
    - long time on-site ASH legal counsel Joel Rudd (who works at ASH in his capacity as a staff attorney with the Arizona Office of Attorney General);                                                                                                                 
   - Jesus Murietta's primary attending psychiatrist Dr. Steven Morris (who as per the practice was most directly familiar with and responsible for establishing Murietta's state of mind, and who I believe is now in private practice in the Phoenix area: 8151 E Indian Bend Rd, Set 105B, Scottsdale, AZ 85250 [this is the man's purported  operating business address, available online at www.vitals.com);
   - and not to be forgotten, former short time ASH Supervisor Cory Nelson, who willfully engaged in furthering the highly inaccurate information specific to this issue following the horrific slaying of April Mott, by characterizing the cover up process itself as a matter of Murietta's "civil rights" (and who has since been promoted to excessively high position of Deputy Director of the entire BHS network!);
   - and finally, any number of other like administrative representatives, senior clinical staff (including current ASH Chief Medical Officer Laxman Patel), and any associated staff who had/have the common sense to recognize the critical nature of this matter as it played out in May-September, 2011; all of whom willfully chose to deny the public of their due rights in this context- which did undeniably cost April Mott her life.


I feel deeply compelled, as per my own legal background and deep respect for the legal field in itself, that ASH's onsite formal legal representative, Joel Ruddmust have been aware of this issue at the time that it initially arose, in the hours and days immediately following  Murietta's escape. As such, I feel that it is critically important to realize that Rudd functions in his position at ASH as a staff attorney with the Office of the Arizona Attorney General (under the authority of current Arizona AG Tom Horne), which is one the most trusted positions of trust existent in contemporary state government. Herein we have one more bright line example of how extensive the wrongdoing at ASH is, in fact, for the implication is clear: The criminal conduct that ASH's senior staff are increasingly being to shown to have engaged in has occurred under a guise of legal protection from the state of Arizona's most powerful law firm, in effect. Due to this clearly criminal complicity between Rudd and various administrative staff at ASH, complicity which began immediately following Murietta's violent escape from ASH, and which continued to play out over the summer months of 2011, an innocent young Phoenix woman was brutally murdered less by Murietta less than 12 full weeks after that covered up escape. Which, again, ASH administrators blatantly covered up, including in terms of their knowledge that Murietta had threatened to murder the family of an ASH housekeeper in the days following the escape. It is- all of it- as unspeakably disturbing an exhibition of ineptitude and outright criminality as one might witness today in terms of mental health care and related public interest. 

Substandard mental-medical health care,

and they are getting away with it.  

      End of story, more than enough said. The main point that I am seeking to make by restating my concerns about this specific issue, is simply that I know for a fact that this sorts of misconduct does occur at ASH on a regular basis. This one particular incident, in other words, is not exclusive or unique, but the fact is, the vast majority of staff wrongdoing that is directly harming ASH's patient community never gains attention. It should be of no surprise to any reasonably informed person that only the most graphic events make the news, as it were; and for this reason , I only ask that my readers consider the implications of this matter, as follows: If these sorts of high ranking individuals are willing to so blatantly defy established law and policy specific to the public trust, you can only imagine how far the extent of unreported patent abuse reaches. 

FUNDAMENTAL ETHICS DICTATE THE FACT THAT THIS ISSUE PLAYED OUT WELL BEYOND THE PARAMETERS OF ACCEPTABLE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. IN THIS SENSE, THE UNDENIABLE FACT REMAINS THAT IF THE ONE'S CENTRALLY INVOLVED IN THIS CYCLE OF DECEPTION ARE NOT HELD ACCOUNTABLE AS PER ANY ALL PROVISIONS OF LAW, THERE IS NOTHING KEEPING "THEM" FROM, CARRYING ON WITH THIER HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE MISBEHAVIOR, WHICH I CONTEST YET AGAIN GOES ON AT ASH ON AN DAY IN-DAY OUT BASIS. AND THEY KNOW WHO THEY ARE, DOWN TO THE LAST ONE OF THEM. 

NELSON, DINGLE, RUDD, MORRIS, NORIEGA, AND THE REST.


Even outside of the highly restricted conditions at The Arizona State Hospital, seriously mentally ill and disabled persons commonly experience deeply embedded forms of discrimination and prejudice which  effectively limit their given power of speech, and on the basis of these inherent  challenges in direct relation to the affects of any patient actual mental disability/wellness, most/many ASH staff willfully abuse patient rights in ways that I know would shock the sensibility of the public today. These ASH staff do so by taking inordinately bad faith advantage of any ASH patients' mental condition in order to get away with highly illegal and unethical misbehavior. Specifically, due to the very real affects of mental illness, many of my former patient-peers are deemed legally "incompetent", and I attest to the fact that on this basis, anytime an ASH patient chooses to openly report staff misconduct in any form or fashion, accused staff and their supervisors willfully characterize the patient's expressions and concerns as "delusional", or otherwise due to the affects of mental illness. I know this because it happened to me on a number of occasions, imparted as such by my own primary attending psychiatrists (Laxman Patel, Pervaiz Akhter), in spite of my never being diagnosed as psychotic, schizophrenic, or otherwise subject to delusion, hallucination, and so on. It happened as a matter of standard practice- this is simply how these Rat Bastards operate, with no concern whatsoever as to the impacts on any patients welfare- and should be of no surprise to anyone familiar with the conditions in places like ASH. State mental hospitals, that is. But that is not a justification, by any means, and in contemporary times, I strongly believe that most Americans are not willing to accept such misconduct, anywhere, in any context.

     In terms of this one sickeningly outrageous example of delinquency, I respectfully demand that elected members of Arizona's representative state government utilize their given authority and take the grossly unlawful  unlawful misconduct of each and every involved employee of Arizona Department of Health/Behavioral Health Services into account at this time. There is already some momentum generating in terms of light now being shed on the issues that I have dedicated myself to sharing with the public since my February, 2012 discharge from The Arizona State Hospital, and I ask that any one taking formal interest in my writing, or other like data now emerging in this context, keep in mind the simple fact that the taxpaying citizens of our state have fulfilled our duty on terms of providing these state employees with far more than reasonable salaries, etc. Civic action, as such, that creates clear and reasonable expectations that any reasonably conscientious citizen fully understands.  

paoloreed@gmail.com



Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/09/24/3647648/man-accused-of-plot-to-shoot-up.html#storylink=cpy




Thursday, September 26, 2013

Will Humble, Director, Arizona  Department of Health Services

Wherein, my good faith attempt(s) to fully report clinical and administrative patient abuse at The Arizona State Hospital compel me to directly communicate with the highest link in the state's health care systems' entire food chain. 


I originally drafted and sent the following letter to Arizona Department of Health Services Director Will Humble in early February, 2011, less than one month prior to my discharge from The Arizona State Hospital. I was still in there, in other words, witnessing and experiencing the rampant wrongdoing that effectively defines the ASH patient experience in general. At the time, I had nothing but full confidence and good faith willingness to turn to this man, the person with ultimate authority over the operation of any/all public health care resources in Arizona, for by that time, I had virtually exhausted all other like resources (in the sense of related offices in this specific state agency), with no meaningful result whatsoever. I offer this bit of data as a matter of illustrating how deeply unreasonable the management of Arizona's most seriously mentally ill and disabled citizens is today, for the fact of the matter is, Will Humble has patently failed to acknowledge the merits of my expressed concerns, which is indicative of yet one more clear breach of the public trust, and which is tantamount, as well,  to the unlawful conduct of ASH's senior clinicians and administrators.  


                                                         (PJ Reed)           
Arizona State Hospital
2500 E. Van Buren St.
Phoenix, AZ 85008   

Wil Humble, Director                                                                             
February 08, 2012 
Arizona Dept. of Health Services
150 N. 18th Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85007


Dr. Mr. Humble:
      I cannot apologize for feeling the need to again attempt a direct communication with your office. But I realize that you are a very busy man, and that your responsibilities extend for behind my simple needs. I am also thus compelled to at least express for sincere regret of the fact that the predicament I am working tooth and nail to address has again led me to your door. Any time whatsoever that you can afford me is appreciated, ten-fold. With all the due respect that I can muster, I am going to share my avowed belief that there are critically serious problems in the state of affairs that I am working to address. These problems are endemic. They extend to all tangible forms of patient rights and related protections, as per established law and public policy. I have learned in no ucertaion terms that anytime an individual (such as myself)) who may need to choose to call upon himself in terms of participating in his own treatment to the fullest capacity possible will only run into brick walls, should he attempt to speak up for himself in the face of chronic wrongdoing. I attest to this, my statements are truthful to the best of my knowledge, and I approach you purely from a standpoint of good faith intent.                                                            
       In considering how I can best apply myself to something I can something I can only describe as an escalation of utter reject in direct defiance of my expressed concerns (some of which I have been embroiled in for 6-8 months), I have determined that what I am experiencing amounts to nothing less than a broken system. I am specifically talking about ADHS/BHS, in the sense of the term, "system".                                                                                                                                        
      More specifically, I am deeply concerned in this context about the ADHS/BHS Office of Grievances and Appeals (OGA), as it functions in relation to The Arizona State Hospital (ASH).  In keeping of the requirements of the law, as spelled out in the Arizona Administrative Code, Rule 921 Article 4, I began requesting that the ASH ombudsperson, as well as OGA, initiate an investigation into problems that arise under the language of Rule 921 Article 403b at least five months ago, when it become overwhelmingly clear to me that the entire process, as laid out in all applicable provisions of policy and procedure, is being ignored abused or not otherwise applied in accordance what the details afforded therein.                                                                                                                                       
     I am interested in remedial action rather than conflict. I am not dedicated to this as matter of personal gain, but i do see it as being ablslutlely requisite in term of the very real needs, rights, and protection of all persons so affected (as I am). I do not intend or have any desire to file suit (although I know I can). I am solely dedicated to doing all I can to see that these issues be resolved to the fullest degree possible, in accordance with the specifaccly available  standards, and as spelled out in all/any applicable treatises relating tot he issues at hand, because it si the right thing to do.                                                                                                                                       
      In closing, I have no idea if you are in a position as such to read my correspondence. I am doing what I can. Writing you this letter is an expression of civic duty. If, in fact, you do receive and read this, please take a moment, as well, to review the attached documents. I will direct the original grievance to your attention, as well, in the next few days.                                                            
                                                                                                                                                                   
Thank you. Sincerely, --------------- (PJ Reed)                                                                                         
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAST FORWARD September 26, 2013: As stated above, I sent this document to Will Humble about 20 full months ago, at a point in time when I was still a residential patient at The Arizona State Hospital. It is far from the only communique' that I have, to date, forwarded to this man; but this is one my first, and at the time, I did believe I could rely upon him to take a good hard look at the issues that I specifically had sought to bring to light at that time. I did so in numerous formal grievance submissions, as per the protocol and in purely civil terms, to the ADHS/BHS Office of Grievances: and as stated already, these efforts had no significant impact whatsoever in relation to the highly unlawful experiences that I was going through at that time, while still there in the Hospital facility itself. Needless to say- today- I never heard anything back from  Will Humble, and as this process of seeking meaningful response and related redress specific to the substandard conditions at The Arizona State Hospital continues, I feel it is high time for we, the citizens of Arizona and beyond, to subject this man to due oversight and related accountability. Even today- as I write- I know for a fact that the patients at ASH are being continually subjected to medical-mental health care treatment practices that fall far below commonly established standards, and herein is the need to bring clear light upon the realities that any person seeking treatment at ASH faces, in fact. Both staff and patients alike are suffering from the graphic ineptitude of Will Humble, Cory Nelson, Donna Noriega, Joel Rudd, and every one of the other individuals at ASH who possess little to no ethos and related character, in terms of the needs of ASH's seriously mentally ill and disabled patient community, as a whole.

paoloreed@gmail.com